Corporatist
/ Federalist Lie: “I swear to support
and defend the Constitution..”
Only about half of all voting-age
Americans (54%) voted in 1996. By 2000,
voter registration was at an all-time low.[1]
Most Americans don’t write their
legislators either, or sign petitions.
If you ask people why they don’t participate in their
government, many
will tell you it is because they think the system is a sham, a lie. A joke.
They will tell you that they believe politicians are crooks and
that
money and greed are the real drivers of national affairs.
Much of this cynicism comes
from the suspicion that the people in charge aren’t playing by the
rules. The rules for our system of
government were
established after careful (and often heated) debate when the
Constitution went
into effect in 1789. Since then, many
of these rules, in fact, have been and are being, broken.
For example:
The Constitution says that
Congress, not the President, decides when and if we go to war.[2] This is a key element of the
Constitution. It is a primary
difference between America and the monarchy we separated from.[3] The founding fathers wanted to make sure that the
power to make war would never again be in the hands of one man.[4]
[5] They constructed the constitution to place
the power to make war in the hands of Congress, the legislative branch
(representing the people). Having
just
wrested our freedom from a tyrannical king, our founders had no
intention of
enabling any future tyrant to use the military for his own designs.
Fast-Forward to Vietnam, which cost the United States the lives of 58,184 soldiers, sailors and airmen[6], along with untold millions of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian men, women and children. The American people were re-awakened in their determination never to enable another sitting president to conduct a war for his own (or his corporate backers’) purposes, and we passed the Presidential War Powers Act in 1973.
Had it been enforced by a legislature of
good conscience, the Presidential War Powers Act would have prevented
the 2003
invasion of Iraq[7],
which
(based on all evidence) was for the purpose of gaining “Political
Capital”[8],
and for conquest-hungry industrial powers to seize key real-estate in
the
Middle-East, which is strategically significant and which happens to be
sitting
on the second largest oil-reserves on the planet.
In violation of the Constitution and of
the reinforcing Presidential War Powers Act, and in the face of any
conscientious American who cares enough about his family’s future to
look, this
illegal adventure of the executive branch has cost us 1,873 American
dead on
the battlefield at this writing, thousands more American dead en-route
to
medical facilities away from the combat-zone, and tens of thousands of
wounded;
not to mention the utter destruction of entire cities and the general
infrastructure of Iraq, and the wholesale slaughter of the human beings
there,
often with poisonous, depleted-uranium munitions that will leave the
country
contaminated and sick for years to come.
Why, then, since after World War II, have
we had wars all over the world[9]
that were not declared by Congress and were largely pet projects of the
corporate-backed Executives in office at the time?
The fact that George W. Bush calls himself a “War President”
indicates part of the answer: in
wartime the Executive has more power, and in wartime the electorate is
far less
likely to replace that Executive.
Beyond War powers, the constitution also
plainly states that Congress controls the money.[10]
This is to provide a check on the power of the President.
Why, then, are billions of dollars spent
every year in covert “black operations” run by the Pentagon, a
subdivision of
the executive branch, without any oversight by Congress?
John F. Kennedy intended to put a stop to
it.[11] He himself was stopped.[12]
The first amendment has been hijacked by corporations so that when they are caught lying all they have to do is yell “free speech”[13] [14]; while peaceably-assembled protesters across our country are herded into makeshift, guarded, barbed-wire pens insultingly called “free speech zones”[15].
The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution
clearly defines the right for people to be “secure in their persons,
houses,
papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures”. Why, then, do we now have a law on the books
that enables police to break into your home at will, search or seize
the
contents, and not even tell you about it for weeks or months afterward?[16] Why then, are government spies authorized to
peruse your health, purchasing, financial, even your library records,
gagging
the providers of such information from even telling you about it?[17]
Given that the Fourth Amendment is intended
to protect our reasonable expectation of privacy and our basic right to
be “let
alone”[18],
strong cases could be (and have been) made against the prohibition of
intoxicants (the
basis of
the “drug war” and the “booze war” of the 1920’s), and against
persecution of women
who exercise freedom of choice regarding their reproductive health[19].
A Country that Strayed from
its Constitution:
After World War I, Germany became a constitutional republic, but it was under great social, economic and political stresses. Both the ruling class and the ordinary people gradually lost confidence in their democratic government. Common people pretty much ignored it. In this climate of popular resignation and indifference, one radical party gradually gained influence in the legislature. That party grew under a false demagogue (someone who appealed to the “masses”, the “mainstream”, while the corporate elite quietly encouraged him and backed him financially). Taking organized, decisive action amid a relatively sluggish and inept government (the Weimar Republic), this fake demagogue ultimately gained the executive office of Chancellor (appointed by then-senile president Hindenburg). Shortly afterward, the capitol building that housed the legislature (the “Reichstag”) was burned under suspicious circumstances. The false demagogue quickly claimed “emergency” powers through a new law called the “Enabling Act”, canceling out the rights of citizens guaranteed by the constitution.
Hitler then proceeded to thoroughly militarize the country, using propaganda that harnessed hatred and simple, mindless nationalism; and he built a culture that proceeded to persecute and ultimately murder millions of its own people; and to destroy a huge portion of Europe and the people who lived there.
This was before the better judgment of the world crushed him along with his corporatist regime. Ordinary working Americans who had been suffering from the mistakes of the corporate elite here at home (the giant “bubble-burst” called the “Great Depression”), rallied behind Franklin Roosevelt and fought with holy determination in that war against Evil. They fought to protect the freedoms defined for them by the Constitution. Moreover, they fought to defend their homes against the onslaught of a Germany and Japan who were “on the march”[20] in campaigns of global conquest.
What would happen to America under conditions of economic misery in modern times? How does the fact that one state governor recently, publicly boasted that soldiers who were “locked and loaded” would soon be fully able to “shoot to kill” American citizens in one of her cities?[21] Is history repeating itself?[22]
America purportedly was once the envy of the world not just because of her economic success, but more importantly because of the freedom afforded her citizens. America offered the promise of opportunity for a poor person to improve his or her own circumstances. The reason that America was the inspiration for billions of people all over the world is because America is the first, model free republic (representative democracy) in modern history.
The beauty, the dream, the power and the hope of America are embodied in our Constitution. The constitution defines America. The Constitution is America. Anyone who tries to subdue it, circumvent it, or ignore it is a true enemy of America.
To be truly “conservative”, one would have to be in full support of returning our government to what is described in the design outlined in our Constitution, because “conservative” means “resistant to change” and “focused on traditional values”. This is one reason many conscientious conservatives like to display American flags.
Why, then, does the constitution represented by our flag suffer its current, maligned, misrepresented condition, buried under a code of laws so complicated that people make entire careers out of interpreting it? Why do corporate-paid, sold-out blabbermouths in commercial radio and television tend to spin the notion that the Constitution is an old, irrelevent document?
The answer lies in the nature of people, and in what made it necessary for us to have government in the first place: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.”[23] Logic follows that those who are by all means not angels would desire to reduce or destroy government. Government is needed in order to protect the good from the bad. When it is working properly, it ensures that the game of capitalism is played fairly, ensuring competition, which benefits the consumer with superior goods and services. The best government we have been able to come up with, to date, is the one outlined in our Constitution. It’s in the deviations from its plan where we have gotten into trouble. The fourteenth amendment was hijacked by robber-barons a century ago, resulting in corporations stealing the rights of “personhood”, without even establishing true legal precedent[24], while the intended recipients of protections afforded by that amendment, the former African slaves in America, benefited little if any from it at the time.[25]
Every person in the federal government swears an oath to support and defend the Constitution. Loyalty to the Constitution is reaffirmed in the Code of Ethics for Federal Government Employees[26]. If a government official undermines the democratic processes defined in the Constitution, that official is acting against the best interests of the United States. Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution says, “The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
One “High Crime” is “violation of public trust”[27]. George W. Bush violated the public trust by lying to the United States Congress and the American People that Saddam Hussein had attempted to obtain Nuclear materials from Africa[28], as alleged justification for his attack on Iraq[29] (directly undermining the democratic process). This is a violation of the public trust in the highest degree. In the face of this, and in almost complete denial of it, millions of misinformed (or indifferent) Americans stand behind this lie simply because its perpetrator and his ilk claim to be “Republican”. They are not republicans. They are radical, corporatist federalists. “Republic” means representative democracy. Any true republican legislator should be clamoring for the impeachment of this acting[30] president and his entire cabinet by now.
The
Constitution has been misinterpreted and misdirected.
It is today being brutally attacked. It
will continue to be attacked and possibly destroyed or fully
disabled very soon unless all of us wake up, wake up our neighbors,
talk to
each other and get out of our comfort zones and demonstrate about it,
circumventing the lying corporatist/federalist press.
Call your “elected” officials.
DEMAND that your ELECTED OFFICIALS DO what is RIGHT and LIVE UP
to the
OATH to DEFEND the CONSTITUTION that EVERY LAST ONE of them TOOK. Without such action, America will continue
to devolve into dictatorship, and we don’t want to go there.
--- Mark
Frankenberg
[1]
"Voting and Registration
in the Election of November 2000", U.S. Census Bureau, Feb 2002.
[2]
Constitution, Article I,
section 8.
[3]
Abraham Lincoln once said,
“Kings had always been involving and impoverishing their people in
wars,
pretending generally, if not always, that the good of the people was
the
object.”
[4] James Madison said, “…war is, in fact, the true source of executive aggrandizement.”
[5] Dwight Eisenhower, arguably the last true Republican president, said, “I am not going to order any troops into anything that can be interpreted as war, until Congress directs it.”
[6]
Department of Defense,
Directorate for Information Operations and Reports
[7] "Section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution states that the President, as Commander-in-Chief can introduce U.S. forces into hostile situations only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its Armed Forces...Congress has not declared war on Iraq for the purposes of overthrowing Saddam Hussein." -- Congressman Peter Defazio in a letter to President Bush dated September, 2002. None of the hijackers on 9/11 were from Iraq. Regarding Statutory Authorization, irrefutable evidence of Saddam Hussein possessing weapons of mass destruction was never produced, and has still not today, almost three years after the invasion.
[8]
Bush said in 1999, "My
father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis
out of
Kuwait and he wasted it... If I have a chance to invade, if I had that
much
capital, I'm not going to waste it. I'm going to get everything passed
that I
want to get passed..."
[9] "Here is a list of the countries that America has been at war with and bombed since World War II: China (1945-46, 1950-53); Korea (1950-53); Guatemala (1954, 1967-69); Indonesia (1958); Cuba (1959-60); the Belgian Congo (1964); Peru (1965); Laos (1964-73); Vietnam (1961-73); Cambodia (1969-70); Grenada (1983); Libya (1986); El Salvador (1980s); Nicaragua (1980s); Panama (1989), Iraq (1991-99), Bosnia (1995), Sudan (1998); Yugoslavia (1999). And now Afghanistan." -- Arundhati Roy, 2001
[10]
Article I, section 9 states,
"No money shall be drawn from the Treasury but in consequence of
appropriations made by law."
[11] In June, 1961, Kennedy Signed National Security Action Memos 55, 56 and 57, placing peacetime covert actions under the control of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, making those activities theoretically (and rightfully) subject to congressional financial oversight once again.
[12]
The standard security details
intended to protect Kennedy the day he was assassinated in Dallas were
mysteriously called away, and the route of his motorcade was changed to
one
more vulnerable than what was origionally intended.
The Warren Commission investigation of the killing was by many
accounts a cover-up. One flaw in the
Warren
Commission story is that one of the bullets fired, by their story,
would have
had to do loops and turns in mid-air in order to hit all the things
(and
people) their reports said it did.
[13]
A good case to review,
regarding corporate claims to the “free speech rights of corporate
persons” is
the Nike vs. Kasky case. Corporations
are not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution, are given the privilege
to
operate by the government of the people, theoretically; but now they
claim to
have the same rights as people.
Complicity and corruption enable the precipitation of this lie.
[14] Corporatist-biased talk-radio and television lately claim “free speech” when justifying their substitution of “spin” and opinion in place actual unbiased news. The result is a misinformed “mainstream”.
[15] Listen: America is a Free-Speech Zone. Any Questions?
[16] Read section 213 of the Patriot Act, known as “Sneak and Peek”.
[17]
Section 215 of the “Patriot
Act”.
[18]
Continued legal precedent for
“reasonable expectation of privacy” can be found in the court case of
Katz v.
U.S., 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), and for “right to be let alone”, refer
to the
above as well as Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557, 564 (1969) and
Olmstead v.
United States, 277 U.S. 438, 478
(1928), to name a few.
[19]
Women’s right to choose was
affirmed in the case of ROE v. WADE, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) on the basis
of the
right to "personal privacy, protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth,
Ninth,
and Fourteenth Amendments."
[20]
George W. Bush has said in
numerous addresses that “freedom is on the march”.
[21] Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco, September 1, 2005, regarding her intended management of starving citizens of hurricane-stricken New Orleans.
[22] Senator Huey Long was credited with saying, "If fascism ever came to the United States, it would be wrapped in an American flag."
[23]
James Madison, Federalist
Papers No. 51.
[24]
In the case of Santa Clara
County v Southern Pacific Railroad in 1886, the “basis” for “corporate
personhood” was falsely established in contradictory documents covering
the
case, one of which says Chief Justice Waite made the comment: “The
Court does
not wish to hear argument on the question whether the provision in the
Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution … applies to corporations. We are all of the opinion that it does”
(from Ted Nace, Gangs of America: The
Rise of Corporate Power and the Disabling of Democracy, p. 102-104). When the court reporter later
asked for
clarification on this, Waite responded, “…we avoided meeting the
constitutional
question in the decision”. Based on
this, “Corporate Personhood” is not merely “legislation from the
bench”, it is
derived from a misconstrued assumption of
“legislation from the bench”.
[25]
Almost a century after the
fourteenth amendment, Under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
The term
``person'' [now] includes one or more individuals, governments,
governmental
agencies, political subdivisions, labor unions, partnerships,
associations, corporations,
legal representatives, mutual companies, jointstock companies,
trusts,
unincorporated organizations, trustees, trustees in cases under title
11
[bankruptcy], or receivers. I would
argue that “person” should mean a single human being.
Anything else is a distortion of reality.
[26] Executive Order 12674 of April 12, 1989
[27]
“violation of the public
trust” was identified as a “high crime” by Alexander Hamilton in
Federalist
Paper #65
[28]
State of the Union Address,
January 28, 2003.
[29]
Joe Wilson, former ambassador
to Niger, debunked Bush’s claim and exposed the African Uranium claim
as a
fraud. In retaliation, Bush advisor
Karl Rove illegally leaked the identity of one of our CIA agents,
Valerie
(Plame) Wilson, Wilson’s wife, to the press.
[30]
The corporatist Press has
“conveniently” ignored two stolen elections.
Notice how, after our 2004 election, significant attention was
directed
away from America, to election problems in the Ukraine.
Justice Antonin Scalia illegally stopped the
Florida recount in 2000 when he plainly had a vested interest in a Bush
victory; and in 2004 the exit polls (which we use to measure the
integrity of
elections) clearly indicate massive levels of fraud, much of it due to
paperless voting machines. administered by people and companies with
vested
interests in a Bush victory, which, had that fraud been prevented,
would have
resulted in a Kerry victory)
(c) 2005 Mark
Frankenberg. To discuss rights to this document, contact
markspublishing@markfrankenberg.com
|
Could it happen? Is it Happening? Just Say NO to Fascism A Fable by Mark Frankenberg |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||